This morning I went to the clinic yet strangely that wasn’t the first disappointment of the day, that came when I read how Victoria Beckham had guest edited Glamour Magazine and had promptly slapped her panty parts all over their front cover.
Anyway, the third disappointment of the day came when I was looking for a picture on a picture agency website and thought that a set of tiny thumbnails were actually pictures of Victoria’s sad little flower. See above, but take care because I haven’t cropped out Victoria’s unmentionable area from the picture.
There’s not much left for me to say other than gone are the days that a 439-year-old raisin gets the complexion of a pork chop without dipping her face in photoshop.
Links:
Victoria Beckham’s web site is >> here.
Glamour Magazine is >> here

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >>> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls ReTweet
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls Retweet
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls Retweet
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >>> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls RT
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >>-> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls RT
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >>-> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls RT
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls RT
Victoria Beckham Glamour sans Pixels of Reality >> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls RT
Here's Victoria Beckham's Panties Posing As Glamour Magazine's Barbequed Pork Chop, >> http://t.co/IPA2iNwL Pls RT
You must log in to post a comment.